I prefer analog, as simple as possible. I don't like the addition of date functions or chronograph stuff. Light face, dark numbers, no Roman numerals. Pure minimalist.
Analog; my problems with numbers appear to extend to being able to understand the time more readily on a clockface. And I used to occasionally appreciate having a second hand.
Entirely depends on what the watch is being used for. Digital is easier if I am stressed and I just need to know what time it is. I can see the time at a glance without any calculation. But digital watches always require a battery that eventually needs to be replaced and I prefer analog for any measurement of seconds. With analog it is easier for me to see what fraction of a minute has passed at a glance. Analog watches either also need a battery, or else they need to be reset and wound frequently. Both types have a different drawback.
This question for me is a bit like asking if I prefer a fork or a spoon.
From:
no subject
Skapi
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
What are you serving?
This question for me is a bit like asking if I prefer a fork or a spoon.
From:
no subject